Status: Stable
Version: 1.0.0
Author: Rifteo
Tags: red-team, pentest, offensive-security, strategy, prioritization
Summary
Apply an effort-impact ratio to every offensive engagement — always test the highest-yield surface first, never waste budget on paths that show no signal.- Uses a four-quadrant Effort-Impact Framework to orient prioritization: low effort / high impact always goes first
- Identifies high-value surface indicators: custom business logic, auth boundaries, data ingestion points, privileged functionality, recently added features
- Issues communication checkpoints when a finding is reached or a surface goes dry — lets the user steer allocation
- Works standalone or alongside a mindset skill like redmind
SKILL.md file
Discover skill details
Discover skill details
Economist Attack — Offensive Strategy Mindset
When to Use This Skill
- When doing any offensive security engagement and deciding where to focus effort
- When the attack surface is large and not everything can be tested with equal depth
- When the goal is maximum impact from available time and effort
- Works standalone or alongside an offensive mindset skill like redmind
The Economic Lens
- Every action has a cost — time, effort, noise — and an expected return — impact potential
- The ratio between return and cost is what drives prioritization
- The goal is not to test everything — it is to find the most impactful weakness with the least wasted effort
- This does not mean avoiding hard or deep work — it means never investing effort in a path that shows no sign of yielding anything
The Effort-Impact Framework
These quadrants are a thinking tool, not a rule. Use judgment — the framework orients, it does not decide.| Quadrant | Orientation |
|---|---|
| Low effort / High impact | Always first — no reason to delay |
| Low effort / Low impact | Quick check — don’t dwell, move on |
| High effort / High impact | Invest when real signal is present |
| High effort / Low impact | Deprioritize — return only if no other paths remain |
High-Value Surface Indicators
These are signals that a surface is worth deeper investment:- Custom business logic — anything built in-house rather than relying on a standard library or framework
- Authentication and authorization boundaries — where identity is established and access is enforced
- Data ingestion points — anywhere external or user-controlled data enters the system
- Integration points with external systems, third-party APIs, or services
- Recently added or modified features — new code is where errors concentrate
- Privileged or administrative functionality — higher impact when broken
- Anything handling payments, identity, or sensitive data flows
- Complexity — the more moving parts, the more room for assumptions to break
The Ratio Principle
- When two paths have similar impact potential, take the cheaper one first
- When a path is expensive but shows real behavioral signal, the investment is still justified — a high return makes a high cost worthwhile
- Always be asking: is there a path with a better result/effort ratio than the one I am currently on?
- If yes, and the current path has no signal — switch
- If yes, but the current path is actively yielding — finish the thread before switching
What to Deprioritize
- Best-practice findings — missing security headers, weak cookie flags, cipher suite issues — are valid but not the focus of this mindset
- Do not actively hunt best-practice gaps while high-value surfaces remain untested
- These get documented when encountered naturally and become worth pursuing when they chain to something that gives them real impact
- If a surface has been approached from multiple angles with no behavioral signal, it is not yielding — the budget spent here has diminishing returns
Communication Checkpoints
This skill does not decide alone what “enough” looks like — that is a decision made with the user.When a finding is reached:- Surface it to the user with its impact assessment
- Ask whether this level of impact meets the engagement goal or whether to continue deeper
- Do not assume the engagement is over — and do not assume it should continue
- If a surface has been tested without findings, communicate it
- Ask the user whether to invest more depth here or redirect effort to a higher-signal surface
- Present the options — let the user steer the allocation
Domain Calibration
What counts as high-value is not universal — it shifts with the target type. The indicators for a web application are not the same as for an Active Directory environment, a cloud infrastructure, or a binary. Before allocating effort, calibrate the high-value surface indicators to the engagement context.Apply the economic lens after understanding what the target type makes expensive and what it makes cheap to break.Benchmark Results
Tested on claude-sonnet-4-6 via Claude Code CLI. Same prompt, same model, same target. The only variable is whether the skill is loaded.| Metric | Without Skill | With Skill |
|---|---|---|
| First move: high-value surface | No | Yes |
| Low-value surfaces deprioritized | No | Yes |
| Best-practice checks pursued first | Yes | No |
| Communication checkpoint issued | No | Yes |
| High-value surfaces covered (first 3 moves) | 1 / 3 | 3 / 3 |
| Effort wasted on filtered/unreachable ports | Yes | No |
Related skills
redmind
Red team mindset that shifts the agent to offensive security thinking
deadangle
Re-examine every conclusion from multiple angles before delivery
attack-surface
Map the full attack surface of a target before testing begins

